1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoray [572]
3 years ago
12

WENAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS :D POINTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Law
1 answer:
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

heeeeeh thank youuuu!!!

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1) A) Use multiple elaborated historical examples from each decade to explain
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Civil Rights History Project interviews with participants in the struggle include both expressions of pride in women's achievements and ...

7 0
3 years ago
A prominent leader in promoting the settlement house movement was
rewona [7]

Answer:

Jane Addams

Explanation:

Jane Addams who was born in Illinois in September 1860 is the leader of the settlement house movement in the United States of America.  

The noble prize winner was known to have given up marriage and motherhood to enable her help the poor people and engage in social reform.  

She talked favorably in support of respecting the values of traditions upheld by those who migrate to American and ways to help them adjust to their new American environment.  

The settlement movement aimed at ensuring that affluent citizens of the nations and the poor people of the society can come together in close physical proximity and social interconnectedness.  

7 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
what are some reasons to vote for Trump and what are some reasons to vote for Biden this election. NO BIAS.
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer: trump wants to secure our bodes and stabilize immigrants before we over flow and drown in dept      

biden wants to do work withen or country by helping senoir cizens

if you need why not to both then    Trump doent know how to bite his tongue and shutup that could lead to few proplems but

biden is a pedlafiler so pick ur battels.

hair sniffer or big mouth

8 0
3 years ago
Why is living on credit both dangerous to you personally and dangerous to the country?​
worty [1.4K]
Honestly it’s not dangerous to live on credit unless you DON’T PAY YOUR BILLS because with cash you have a higher chance of your money being lost or stolen, and with debit you can only pay exactly what you have in your account penny for penny, but with credit you can over spend a little on Thursday if your pay check comes tomorrow.

Please mark brainliest
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Becky is a 17 years old and has always been trouble. She disobeys her parents, skips school, and seems to have some anger toward
    11·1 answer
  • The two main groupings of nations during World War II were the Allied Powers and the Axis Powers
    13·1 answer
  • What is an Impartial under the Sixth Amendment?
    12·1 answer
  • To help manage risk, it is essential that you ___________ that can increase levels of risk.​
    5·1 answer
  • 10. Which of the following is a true statement about the crime of incitement to commit genocide?
    10·1 answer
  • Please list 2 of the 4 exceptions to the Miranda requirements.​
    12·1 answer
  • No state in the US allows the Governor to directly select people to serve as judges. Group of answer choices true false
    15·1 answer
  • To become a federal judge, what two things must happen
    8·1 answer
  • A(n) ____ is a charging document drawn up by a prosecutor in jurisdictions that do not use the grand jury system.
    10·1 answer
  • Explain what the power to regulate interstate commerce means?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!