Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is what?

1 answer:

4 0

Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.

<u>Explanation: </u>

An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.

However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.

You might be interested in

Identify, discuss, and resolve the conflict between the right to free speech and the government’s regulation of the practice of

vfiekz [6]

The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed

In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.

5 0

3 years ago

How do the system of checks and balances work ? ( at least two checks /balances for each brand , with real-world example/current

tekilochka [14]

Answer:

The system of checks and balances work by ensuring no single branch of government has more power than the other. An example of this would be that the Judicial branch vetoes executive orders. Another example is the executive branch vetoing legislative branch. Some examples of real-world examples, the legislative branch impeached President Donald Trump. This is a example of check's and balances because the legislative branch is ensuring that the executive branch doesn't overpower the other branches. Another check's and balacnes is that the supreme court is nominated by the president confirmed by the legislative branch.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Does spending the most money usually result in an election victory?

Maurinko [17]

Answer:

The candidate who spends the most money usually wins

Explanation:

5 0

1 year ago

If i get into a fight and the cameras only see me swinging bc he hit in the classroom and since i have a history of gettin into

kompoz [17]

Your best bet would be to go to the school first and truthfully explain what happened. Most likely they will appreciate that you came and took accountability for your actions rather than waiting to get in trouble. Not to mention this will give you the opportunity to tell the truth of the situation rather than waiting for someone to potentially report false information and then the administration seeing the camera footage and assuming the worst.

It would also help if you approach the situation as if you wanted to improve your behavior and be a better person rather than just trying to avoid suspension.

Hope this helps!

7 0

2 years ago

A defendant is on trial for a murder that occurred during a robbery at the victim's home. a witness helped the police artist com

olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

No, as hearsay not within any exception.

Explanation:

(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.

8 0

1 year ago