C; they cannot hold jobs.
This is false, if they can get in they can get a job. Unless they get kicked out.
<span>1821---Spanish, on the ruins of the Aztec capital. Small groups have always held power and wealth, while many people have remained poor.Southern Mexico Plateau based on a constitution altitude. Trade with the United States showing that a colonial revolution could succeed. Destruction of Tenochtitlan by Hernán Cortés concentrated within a small upper class. The Aztecs made enemies of the surrounding tribes who were more than happy to assist the Spanish against them. :) I hope I actually helped. </span>
William P. Rogers held<span> two </span><span>cabinet positions</span>
I believe that an advantage to the idea of nationalism is the concrete, established national identity that unites people in a particular area. It emphasizes patriotism and self-determination, which can be empowering concepts for the individual to possess in his or her personal life. However, an unfortunate disadvantage to nationalism is its vulnerability to radical ideas. An extremist ideology can easily rise from a nationalistic base and promote an exclusive identity of peoplehood. This, in turn, may lead to discrimination among members of a country who may not affiliate nationalistically. Simply put, refer back to historical examples of nationalism going too far (Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy).
Answer:
In "smoke-filled room" studies, smoke billowed from a vent in a room. If the research participant in the room was alone, he or she was more likely to get help quickly. If the participant was with a crowd, he or she was likely to either take much longer to get help or not get help at all.
Explanation:
This experiment was conducted by John Darley and Bibb Latané during the 1960s, Columbia University, participants were told to fill questionaries while in a room if the participant was alone in all of the cases they run to the hall to tell someone about the smoke, but in the other part of the experiment the participant was in a room with other people which were confederates of the researchers, and were told to say or do nothing about the smoke, and to say they did not know if they were asked about it, in this part of this experiment 9 of 10 participants stayed quiet and finished the test watching the smoke but refusing to move because of the social pressure.
