Answer: RESERVED EASEMENT.
Explanation: Reserved easement can be defined as the legal right by the person that granted the real property to use the real property of another individual, generally in order to cross a part of the property, or to gain access to something on the property.
In most countries, the original grantors of property is the government.
Like in the example stated above, the government can use Reserved easement Which is perfectly legal to take the land of Steve.
<span>The effect the fierce competition among industrial nations had globally was that it altered patterns of world trade.</span>
Answer:
Hey there!
D is the correct answer because it is NOT true. In 1972, California had the least number of representatives, but in 2008, it had the most.
In 1972, Texas had the least.
Let me know if this helps :)
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
