Answer:
inductive reasoning
Explanation:
There are essentially two different kinds of reasoning when it comes to new ideas:
- Inductive reasoning: This reasoning focuses in particular observations that will lead to generalizations.
- Deductive reasoning: This reasoning is the opposite of the first one and it focuses in generalizations and ideas which will be tested in particular observations.
Therefore, in inductive reasoning, empirical observations lead to new ideas.
This doesn't occur before the formal operational stage.
According to Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, every person goes through 4 developmental stages:
- sensorimotor : birth - 24 months
- preoperational: 24 months - age 7
- concrete operational: 7 - 14
- formal operational: adolescence - adulthood
Only when we reach the final stage of development can we put ourselves in somebody else's shoes and see things from their perspective, according to Piaget.
Answer:
b. Palaniappan Chidambaram(born 16 September 1945) is an politician and former attorney who currently serves as Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha and formerly served as the Union Minister of Finance and Union Minister of Home Affairs of India
Answer:
The answer <em><u>is the cognitive map.</u></em>
Explanation:
A cognitive map is a mind map learned from a spatial environment, usually without being aware of the fact that you have learned. This theory focuses on spatial aspects of the environment and takes them as critical attributes of memory. The theory holds that animals can learn about the spatial relationships of objects and relate events to the spatial context of their occurrence in their Central Nervous System (CNS).
Answer:
the dirty harry problem
Explanation:
The dirty harry problem is a scenario usually common within the law enforcement agency such as the police or in the military. The dirty harry problem is a moral dilemma that arises whereby an officer is faced with making an urgent and decisive call along the line of duty, of which such call or decision is against the ethics or protocols laid down for engagement, but which, if taken would be beneficial or bring a greater good to the society and all even if the means of achieving such seem unacceptable.
From the information given in the question about having to make a decision that seem morally unacceptable in other to achieve a moral good, the dillemma you are faced with as an officer can be referred to as <em>the dirty harry problem.</em>
