<em><u>The equation shows the relationship between her weekly salary (w), hours per week (h), and rate per hour (r) is:</u></em>

<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
Given that,
Alice earned $12 per hour
1 hour = $ 12
<em><u>Find the number of hours in 1 week</u></em>
1 day = 24 hours
1 week = 7 days
Therefore,
1 week = 7 x 24 = 168 hours
Let "h" be the hours per week
let "r" be the rate per hour
Let "w" be the rate per hour
From given,
r = $ 12
h = 168 hours
weekly salary = hours per week x rate per hour


Thus, she earns $ 2016 for 1 week
The arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
<h3>Arbitrage profit</h3>
Given:
Future contract= 1645
Sport gold price = 1592
Risk-free rate (rf) = .03
Hence:
Arbitrage profit=1645-[1592(1+1.03)¹]
Arbitrage profit=1645- 1639.76
Arbitrage profit=1645 =$5.24
Therefore the arbitrage profit implied by these prices is $5.24.
Learn more about arbitrage profit here:brainly.com/question/15394730
#SPJ1
Answer:
5.47%
Explanation:
The computation of yield to maturity is shown in the attachment:
Given that
FV = $1000
PV = ($980)
PMT = 5% ÷ 2 × 1,000 = $25
Number of years = 5 years × 2 = 10 Years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the yield to maturity is
= 2.73 × 2
= 5.46%
Therefore with the help of spreadsheets (as attached), we could explain in a better manner.
Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.