<span>Palmer's experiment, in which he asked people to identify objects in a kitchen, showed how "context" can affect perception.
</span>Context unquestionably impacts perception and behavior. In the event that you are encompassed by cheerful individuals you will probably see occasions as constructive as opposed to being encompassed by irate individuals where your observations will be negative.
Conditions of enthusiastic excitement need a context will make distinctive recognitions and prompt altogether different practices.
I think it’s d because that’s how they decide the laws and stuff
Answer:c.No, because although the two may be correlated, causation has not been established.
Explanation: Correlation only show us that there exist a relationship between two variable but it doesn't actual say that one is the cause of the other. It doesn't give us the cause of why this is happening or it doesn't say that these agreements are the cause of partners staying long with each other , it only tells us that there seems to be a relationship of some sort that exist. They may be may underlying causes that drives this which are not related to just argument so since correlation doesn't mean causation one can not make a conclusion from just correlation alone.
The event that jumpstarted the third wave by Rebecca Walker was the misogyny against women she experienced.
<h3>What is the third wave?</h3>
This was a publication that was founded by Rebecca Walker. This was in response to acts on women.
The wave responded to the fact that women were in a male dominated world. It focused on micro politics and things that were good for females.
Read more on the third wave here:
brainly.com/question/10104055
