Answer:
They believed that if the federal government had control of the army and the militia it would be very dangerous, because the government would have a strong centralization of power.
Explanation:
For anti-federalists, allowing the government to have centralized control of the militia would give a lot of power to the head of federal control, that is, it would give a lot of power to the president. This could promote a strong abuse of power, as the country's armed forces would be controlled by a single person, who would be too powerful to be prevented from acting as he wished.
If you plug in the coordinates on a map, you get Worden, MT.
Answer:
Authority is continually changing based on who is at the head of government is the answer.
Explanation:
The Australians government promotes the federal government through parliament provisions and other judicature, which are also called the government branches. However, the central features of the ruling system are not indicated in the constitution. This, therefore, implies it is the responsibility of the government towards parliament.
This remains a central feature of the Westminster style of ruling. It is different from other systems that have various executive that answers directly to the legislature.
