Answer:
Glaucon seemed to think the answer was no. But Paul Feldman sides with Socrates and Adam Smith—for he knows the answer, at least 87 percent of the time, is yes.
Explanation:
Compared with Feldman's argument, the tale of "The Ring of Gyges" is best described as a counterclaim to the idea that most people are moral. The tale is about the corruption of a man, Gyges, that found a ring that made him invisible. One he had that power he saw no reason to follow society's morals and did whatever he wanted to. One could argue that the reason that many people have to "behave" or to act according to the law and morals of a society is the look of others. The judgment that one would encounter should he not follow a certain rule, even if they are "little" things.
Pretty positive its false, don't hate me if I'm wrong, lol.
No i’m not because there isn’t anything to do anyways
The Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.
<h3>What does
Critique of Pure Reason explains?</h3>
The Critique describes how a priori knowledge is provided by pure reason and how knowledge is provided by a transcendental unity of reason and experience.
Hence, the Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.
Read more about Pure Reason
<em>brainly.com/question/61301</em>
#SPJ1
