Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The vertical line test is what I used to test this.
Answer:
Yes, result is significant ; PVALUE < α
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
x = 536
n = sample size = 1012
Phat = x / n = 536 / 1012 = 0.5296 = 0.53
H0 : P0 = 0.5
H1 : P0 > 0.5
Test statistic :
(Phat - P0) ÷ sqrt[(P0(1 - P0)) / n]
1-P0 = 1 - 0.5 = 0.5
(0.53 - 0.5) ÷ sqrt[(0.5*0.5)/1012]
0.03 ÷ 0.0157173
= 1.9087
Pvalue :
Using the Pvalue from test statistic :
Pvalue = 0.02815
To test if result is significant :
α = 0.05
0.02815 < 0.05
Pvalue < α ; Hence, result is significant at α=0.05; Hence, we reject H0.
The two triangles we can see in the diagram are similar, which means that their measurements are proportional. Line MN on the larger triangle MNP is 71.5ft long, and its corresponding line, MA, on the smaller triangle is 71.5-22= 49.5ft long. This means that the scale factor from the bigger to the smaller triangle is 71.5/49.5=13/9.
If line MP on the bigger rectangle is 97.5ft long, then its corresponding line, MB, must be 97.5÷13/9=67.5 ft long.
Therefore, x=67.5 ft
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: You are usually multiplying
Step-by-step explanation: The graph usually curves and not straight.
