Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787 was a meeting about issues in the government and how they were going to be set up properly. This resolved the issue of representation in government and ended up agreeing on proportional government for the upper and lower house.
While other primates (such as baboons and red colobus, red tail, and blue monkeys) have managed to thrive in Gombe, chimpanzees have not. Their larger body size puts them at a disadvantage in a restricted habitat, because they must consume more calories (and thus more food) to grow and maintain their weight.
Answer:
If you still need help so I can
Explanation:
