Answer:
Health and Safety
Environmental laws protect the health and safety of humans and the environment. For example, the Clean Air Act limits emissions of pollutants, and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act prohibits dumping of waste into U.S. ocean waters without a permit. (See References 1 and 4) Without such laws, businesses and individuals might do whatever was most convenient or cost-effective for them, rather than acting for the good of society and the environment.
Innovation
Stricter environmental laws tend to increase innovative environmentally friendly technology, writes Frank Wijen in "A Handbook of Globalization and Environmental Policy." (See Reference 5, Page 216) The demand for sustainable technology rises as companies and individuals must follow stricter environmental regulations, leading researchers and clean energy entrepreneurs to focus on developing such technologies. Ultimately, this increases the prominence of sustainable technologies, making them more accessible.
Costs
Businesses may see certain environmental laws in a negative light if they must adapt their practices and increase spending to comply with regulations. Individuals may feel inconvenienced by particular laws as well, such as a new law against fishing in a favorite spot. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of environmental laws often proves challenging, as negative effects of not implementing these laws -- such as death, illness and ecosystem destruction -- cannot always be easily quantified in monetary terms. (See Reference 2) However, becoming more environmentally friendly may actually save businesses and individuals money in the long term, particularly by reducing waste and energy usage, despite the cost of the initial investment.
Oversights
Environmental laws that impose regulations without considering their impacts on local communities come with a serious disadvantage: lack of local support. For example, a law that commands people to stay out of a protected natural area, without recognizing that people rely on this ecosystem for their own daily needs, may not only constitute a human rights violation, but may actually backfire, says the Center for International Forestry Research. Community participation in ecosystem management helps to ensure compliance with regulations, reports CIFOR.
Explanation:
1. Germans were the first to use flamethrowers in WWI. Their flamethrowers could fire jets of flame as far as 130 feet (40 m).
2. More than 65 million men from 30 countries fought in WWI. Nearly 10
million died. The Allies (The Entente Powers) lost about 6 million
soldiers. The Central Powers lost about 4 million.
3. Nearly 2/3 of military deaths in WWI were in battle. In previous conflicts, most deaths were due to disease.
4. “Little Willie” was the first prototype tank in WWI. Built in 1915, it
carried a crew of three and could travel as fast as 3 mph (4.8 km/h).
5. During WWI, British tanks were initially categorized into “males” and
“females.” Male tanks had cannons, while females had heavy machine guns.
6. In August 1914, German troops shot and killed 150 civilians at Aerschot.
The killing was part of war policy known as Schrecklichkeit
(“frightfulness”). Its purpose was to terrify civilians in occupied
areas so that they would not rebel.
7. Artillery barrage and mines created immense noise. In 1917, explosives
blowing up beneath the German lines on Messines Ridge at Ypres in
Belgium could be heard in London 140 miles (220 km) away.
8. The Pool of Peace is a 40-ft (12-m) deep lake near Messines, Belgium. It
fills a crater made in 1917 when the British detonated a mine
containing 45 tons of explosives.
9. Tanks were initially called “landships.” However, in an attempt to
disguise them as water storage tanks rather than as weapons, the British
decided to code name them “tanks.”
10. During WWI, the Spanish flu caused about 1/3 of total military deaths.
Mark me as brainliest if I helped.
Answer:
The correct answer is the second statement: <em>They had different ideas about the ultimate power of the federal government</em>.
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson believed that the most important instance of the realization of democracy was the state. He thought that the US should develop in a way that people could have simple lives habiting farms and growing food for living with little surplus production. Because of this communal view is that the state was so politically important for him.
Alexander Hamilton believed almost on the contrary. He wanted the US to invest in international trade and to take part in the global trade system. He wanted the country to be able to sell not only food but also manufactured goods. Because of this view, he stood for a strong national government that could organize the country and put it in this economic course.
The goverment of Vladimer Lenin!
A picture made of many small colored stones is a Mosaic.
<h3>What is a mosaic?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the type of art that is made with the arrangements and the display of objects that are glued on paper or on a board of wood.
It is done with the use of colorful materials that may be glass, beads and other object. This would then leave a beautiful array on the board. Hence we can say that A picture made of many small, colored stones is a Mosaic.
Read more on Mosaic here: brainly.com/question/6532081
#SPJ1