To stop them from using his composition, the court is most likely to order an "injunction".
Injunction alludes to a court arrange for a gathering to do something or cease from accomplishing something. It is usually utilized when a permit to property or intellectual property is at dispute. A gathering that neglects to conform to injunction faces criminal or common punishments, including conceivable fiscal authorizes and even detainment.
Answer:
Changes
Explanation:
What seems to be the most logical answer when the Earth's crust moves is that the surface changes over time.
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
Answer:
CCMC. Commission for Case Manager Certification.
Explanation:
hope it helps
Answer:
The Iroquois Confederacy sided with the British during the French and Indian War. The Iroquois Confederacy claimed that it owned the lands that made up the Ohio Country. The British government, which argued that the Iroquois were their subjects, used the Iroquois claim to assert that it held legal title to the land.
