I'll give brainlest, if you be right! : )
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
40 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the attachment
<h2>Answer with explanation:</h2>
Let p be the proportion of of all adults in the town that have been exposed to this strain of the flue .
As per given , we have
∵ is two-tailed , so the test is a two-tailed test.
Test statistic :
, where p= population proportion
= sample proportion
n= sample size
Put n= 6 and and p=0.08
P-value for two-tailed test : 2P(Z>|z|)
=2P(Z>|-0.415|)
=2P(Z>0.415)
=2[1-P(Z≤0.415)] [∵ P(Z>z)=1-P(Z≤z)]
=2(1-0.6609) [ by z-table]
=0.6782
Decision : Since the p-value(0.6782) is > significance level(0.01) , so we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
We conclude that that we do not have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of all adults in the town that have been exposed to this strain of the flue differs from the nationwide percentage of 8%.