Jessica made 6 19/20 cups of punch. Her punch had two different types of juice in it. If the punch had 4 1/5 cups of one type of
2 answers:
You might be interested in
A stuntman jumping off a 20-m-high building is modeled by the equation h = 20 – 5t2, where t is the time in seconds. A high-speed camera is ready to film him between 15 m and 10 m above the ground. For which interval of time should the camera film him?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
A stuntman jumping off a 20-m-high building is modeled by the equation
-----------(1)
A high-speed camera is ready to making film between 15 m and 10 m above the ground
when the stuntman is 15m above the ground.
height
Put height value in equation 1
We know that the time is always positive, therefore
when the stuntman is 10m above the ground.
height
Put height value in equation 1
Therefore ,time interval of camera film him is
Answer:
A.
B. Z=2.255. P=0.01207.
C. Although it is not big difference, it is an improvement that has evidence. The scores are expected to be higher in average than without the review course.
D. P(z>0.94)=0.1736
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>A. state the null and alternative hypotheses.</em>
The null hypothesis states that the review course has no effect, so the scores are still the same. The alternative hypothesis states that the review course increase the score.
B. test the hypothesis at the a=.10 level of confidence. is a mean math score of 520 significantly higher than 514? find the test statistic, find P-value. is the sample statistic significantly higher?
The test statistic Z can be calculated as
The P-value of z=2.255 is P=0.01207.
The P-value is smaller than the significance level, so the effect is significant. The null hypothesis is rejected.
Then we can conclude that the score of 520 is significantly higher than 514, in this case, specially because the big sample size.
C. do you think that a mean math score of 520 vs 514 will affect the decision of a school admissions adminstrator? in other words does the increase in the score have any practical significance?
Although it is not big difference, it is an improvement that has evidence. The scores are expected to be higher in average than without the review course.
D. test the hypothesis at the a=.10 level of confidence with n=350 students. assume that the sample mean is still 520 and the sample standard deviation is still 119. is a sample mean of 520 significantly more than 514? find test statistic, find p value, is the sample mean statisically significantly higher? what do you conclude about the impact of large samples on the p-value?
In this case, the z-value is
In this case, the P-value is greater than the significance level, so there is no evidence that the review course is increasing the scores.
The sample size gives robustness to the results of the sample. A large sample is more representative of the population than a smaller sample. A little difference, as 520 from 514, but in a big sample leads to a more strong evidence of a change in the mean score.
Large samples give more extreme values of z, so P-values that are smaller and therefore tend to be smaller than the significance level.