Answer:
Objective function:
Maximize Z: 30P1 + 25P2 + 28P3
Subject to: 2.00P1 + 1.50P2 + 3.00P3 ≤ 450 (Department A constraint)
2.50P1 + 2.00P2 + P3 ≤ 350 (Department B constraint)
0.25P1 + 0.25P2 + 0.25P3 ≤ 50 (Department C constraint)
P1, P2, P3 ≥ 0 (Non-negativity)
Explanation:
The objective function is formulated from the contribution margin of the three products. For instance, the contribution of Product 1 is $30, the contribution of Product 2 is $25 and the contribution of Product 3 is $28. Thus, the objective function will be 30P1 + 25P2 + 28P3.
The constraints were obtained from the departmental labour hours requirements for each product. For instance, Product 1 requires 2 hours in department A, Product 2 requires 1.50 hours in department A and Product 3 requires 3 hours in Department A. Thus, the constraint will be 2.00P1 + 1.50P2 + 3.00P3.
Answer:
In the given context, the correct definition for an employee, would be that of an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Explanation:
An employee is a person who is hired by an employer to execute functions that are necessary to his organization's full operation. In the context of the stockmarket, an employee of a company would not trade for his or her account, but for his employer's account, following their policies and intentions. Therefore, an employee is an individual who executes orders to buy and sell for clients of his or her brokerage firm.
Answer:
An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged
Explanation:
Answer:
See explanation below
Explanation:
Option of selling unfinished bookcase
Sales
$58
Less Variable cost
$38
Contribution
$20
Less fixed cost
$10
Net profit
$10
Option of selling finished bookcases
Sales
$73
Less variable cost
$7
Contribution
$66
Less fixed cost
$10
Net profit
$56
With regards to the above analysis, it is recommended that Pine street inc. Should go with the option of selling finished bookcases because it would yield the company the highest profit.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, The lump sum is always better.
Explanation:
If I would have to give advice to my friend who is in the same situation as i was in some time back, I would recommend him to go for the Lump sum choice. This is because of the fact that the interest rate compounded in three years payment schedule will result in the less value of what I am getting today. Accepting the lump sum value in contrast with accepting the yearly payments on 9% interest rate would be better off because it has more value at present.
