Explanation:
The Islamic State (ISIS) is in sharp decline, but in its rout lie important lessons and lingering threats. This is true for the four countries of the Maghreb covered in this report, Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia, which constitute a microcosm of ISIS’ identity, trajectory and shifting fortunes to date. Those countries possess two unwanted claims to fame: as a significant pool of ISIS foreign fighters and, in the case of Libya, as the site of ISIS’ first successful territorial conquest outside of Iraq and Syria. The pool is drying up, to a point, and the caliphate’s Libyan province is no more. But many factors that enabled ISIS’s ascent persist. While explaining the reasons for ISIS’ performance in different theatres is inexact and risky science, there seems little question that ending Libya’s anarchy and fragmentation; improving states’ capacities to channel anger at elites’ predatory behaviour and provide responsive governance; treading carefully when seeking to regiment religious discourse; and improving regional and international counter-terrorism cooperation would go a long way toward ensuring that success against ISIS is more than a fleeting moment.
Its operations in the Maghreb showcase ISIS’s three principal functions: as a recruitment agency for militants willing to fight for its caliphate in Iraq and Syria; as a terrorist group mounting bloody attacks against civilians; and as a military organisation seeking to exert territorial control and governance functions. In this sense, and while ISIS does not consider the Maghreb its main arena for any of those three forms of activity, how it performed in the region, and how states reacted to its rise, tells us a lot about the organisation.
The Establishment Clause and the Free exercise clause are held in the following lines of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution <u>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."</u>
The Establishment Clause ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion") is the clause that separates government from state by prohibiting the government from creating a nationally recognized religion and, as some Supreme Court cases have stated, it also prohibits the government from unduly preferring or sponsoring one religion over other religions.
The Free Exercise Clause (or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."), on the other hand, guarantees people's right to believe in the religion they want and do actions made on behalf of those beliefs.
So, while the first clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion, the second one prohibits the government from forbidding people's exercise of their beliefs on religion.
The correct answer is "<span>two-thirds of adults".
Siblings are individuals who has one or both parents in common with each other, or in other words they come from one family. Siblings are mostly close to each other and sometimes it depends on how they are raised, sometimes siblings may be greedy or selfish to one another, yet it is up to their parents on how they will be treated and how siblings will treat their brothers or sisters.</span>
Answer:
D is the correct answer because it is
