Answer:
The purpose of the law.
Law as the body of rules and regulations which are authorised by each state to be obeyed by individuals citizens aims at protecting individual right and ensure that each of us do right by the other person under the prescribed and authorized legal actions. It guides our action towards others and our surroundings (i.e property and environment)
Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is intended to protect people's rights and their safety; both combined.
The law states that all the vehicles must have tittle that shows who is the owner and also recognises the agreement of lending and borrowing money. Now if the car tittle is now under this new friend who had promised to pay little by little, he is expected by the law to pay for this car under the agreement he made with her friend. The friend who gave his title of the car away to her friend has the right to sue the friend who now has a title to the car and be supported by the law to have this friend pay for it .
What could happen if the law did not exist?
They would be an increase in illegal activities and people would have no respect of other people's right that they will just walk over them. For example a person would just borrow your money and never pay you back, conflict would arise as people fight on their own for their rights and chaos will reign.
It would be hard and impossible to rule the country by the government or to maintain peace amongst its citizens.
Explanation:
Answer:
All Forms Are Valid
Explanation:
Assuming the traditional view of existential import, categorical syllogism has all forms valid.
The traditional view of A and E prepositions are areas where existential assumption arises from.
Categorical syllogism forms are all valid because all syllogisms which are of the same form are equally valid or invalid. This validity is as a result of evaluating the traditional view of existential import.
To truly evaluate the validity of categorical syllogism, the following can be carried out :
1. Make a drawing of three overlapping circles and label each to represent major, minor and middle.
2. Make drawings of both syllogism's premises
3. Without drawing anything, look out for drawing of conclusion. Conclusion is done without drawing anything.
Answer and Explanation:
The reason why Zinn opined that we shouldn't trust histories written from point of view of Governments and leaders is that they tend to use attempts through politics and culture, to ensnare ordinary people in a giant web of nationhood hiding under the canopy of common interest.
