About ninety percent of worldwide stocks of tuna, cod, and other large ocean fishes have disappeared in the last 50 years.
Despite being present in every ocean in the world, tuna and other fishes have started disappearing. The North Atlantic, South Atlantic, as well as the Mediterranean Sea, have the worst conditions for the majority of fish species.
Bluefin, albacore, and yellowfin tuna stocks have drastically decreased as a result of years of overfishing for American and European markets. Although the Atlantic fisheries is heavily regulated, illegal fishing off the shore of coastal seas persists, particularly close to Africa, where impoverished nations cannot afford the patrols required to execute the law.
However, tuna populations cod and other large fish oceans are declining even in the world's largest oceans, and some face extinction due to the continuous pressure of intensive commercial fishing.
To learn more about overfishing click here :
brainly.com/question/5142437
#SPJ4
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is the ratio of dividends paid to shareholders in proportion to net income
Payout ratio = dividends / net income
If dividend payout ratio of one half, it means that only half of net income is paid as dividends
To calculate for the approximate market potential, we
simply have to take the ratio of the current market demand over the market
development index in fraction. That is:
market potential = 320 million / 0.55
<span>market potential = 582 million</span>
Answer:
<em>c</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
<em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>g</em><em>o</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>f</em><em> </em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em>u</em><em>c</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>m</em><em>p</em><em>l</em><em>o</em><em>y</em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>f</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em>u</em><em>l</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>c</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>g</em><em>o</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>n</em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>p</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>/</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>a</em><em>x</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
