The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Question:
<em>which of the following best describes the African American experience in the military? </em>
Answer:
<em>D.) African american troops were segregated throughout the war.</em>
Hope this helps!
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "(b.) she would be a follower of Hinduism." the statement that would most likely be true if you met a traveler from india in 1400 BCE is that <span>(b.) she would be a follower of Hinduism.</span>
Answer:
Q1: they faced discrimination from white southerners.
Q2: southern politicians
Q3: slaves were not allowed to hold religous services.
Q4: they were hung
Q5: many slave owners began capturing white slaves
Q6: Labor intensiveness
Q7: Southern such as florida, alabama, miss, tx
Q8:Society divided
Q9: The cotton gin
Q10: and they used their power and influenced harshly
Explanation:
These seem accurate for that time period, hope this helps
Answer:
I think it was the totally hair Barbie.
