The correct answer to this open question is the following.
According to Descartes, the responsible for finding out the truth was oneself and the mind when it states "I think therefore I am." French philosopher, Rene Descartes's approach to the truth had to first, express doubt.
Those responsible for finding the truth were supposed to complete this task by doubting first, questioning their own existence. Then, through the mind, the reason, confirm their existence because they had the capacity to think.
I think the truth cannot be found in one religion, such as Christianity, Catholicism, or many others, because those are dogmas developed by people through different eras. The truth depends on the perspective of every individual. There is no single truth in life that apply to all the people around the world. Diversity is the name of the game, and that is the reason why many religions exist to satisfy people's spiritual necessities. If we do not respect other people´s teachings, truths, and necessities, that is when problems arise.
After the British takeover of the New Netherlands, the control of the entire economic and political affairs went into the hands of the English Crown.
<h3>What is the significance of the British takeover of the New Netherlands?</h3>
The British gained a control over the New Netherlands in the second half of the seventeenth century. After this takeover, there was complete transfer of the control of economic and political affairs of the society.
The event of the British takeover of the New Netherlands was led by Richard Nicholls at the New York Harbor. The Dutch readily gave the control in the British hands, avoiding a fight.
Hence, the significance of the British takeover of the New Netherlands is aforementioned.
Learn more about the British takeover of the New Netherlands here:
brainly.com/question/1498757
#SPJ1
The answer would be because it provided many new ideas to the American colonists.
I need a picture! There’s no context or explanation behind your question!
Answer:
The New York banker pushed the limits when he exchanged his mansion for a Cartier necklace valued at $1 million in 1917 which he gave to his young wife. While this was a great show of love, it was, in the economic sense, a very bad investment as not too long afterward, the cost of pearls would fall and after the death of Plank’s wife, the gift would go for a paltry $150,000.
