Answer:
a. net income= understated, retained earnings= understated
Explanation:
In accounting and auditing it is established that ending inventory and net income moves in the same direction when it comes to being overstated or understated. That implies that if <u>ending inventory is understated</u>, then cost of goods sold will be overstated by the same amount, and when costs are overstated it finally leads to <u>net income and gross profit being understated.</u>
Furthermore, since it is the net income that will be added to retained earnings thereafter, it implies that the lesser the net income the lesser will be retained earnings. Hence, understatement of ending inventory is understatement of net income and also retained earnings.
The answer is: 30 Trips
Total fans = 100,000
<u>The amount of fans that need satelite parking </u>
= 100,000 x 42%
= 42,000 fans
<u>There are 20 buses and each of them can carry 70 fans in one trip. So the maximum number of fans that all of them can carry in one trip:</u>
= 70 x 20
= 1400 fans
<u>Total trips that each bus need to take all fans to stadium </u>
= 42,000 / 1400
= 30 trips
Answer:
b. the price of a good will eventually rise in response to an excess demand for that good.
Explanation:
As more people are willing to purchase the good the price will rise. Because, the supplier can offer up to certain amount given their current production factors thus, this increase in demand is met with an increase of price. In the future this increase in price which generates more producer surplus will make more company’s invest in the business or the current ones will develop new ways of production to produce more and therefore; lowering the price.
Answer:
Decrease
Increase
Explanation:
If millions are moving out of a country, the number of people living in the country would fall and the demand for houses would fall. While the demand for houses where the people are immigrating to would increase as population would increase and they would need where to live.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
Firm A is uniquely situated to the pioneering research and firm B is uniquely situated to application development. There are significant differences arising from broad patent law and narrow patent law. Firm A conducting pioneering research and Firm B conducting development application in this situation the incentive problem is solved when transaction cost is zero. When the transaction cost is zero the breadth of the patent will not matter to the economic efficiency So long as the can bargain with each other. The bargain between inventors is cost-less and makes efficient contracts.
When the transaction cost obstructs the bargaining between the suppliers of pioneering research of and development of application problem arises. The solutions to the problem are lubricating bargaining and allocate rights to the firm who values the most.
Patent protection for the pioneering inventions should be broader for the little standalone value. In contrast patent protection for pioneering invention should be narrower for large standalone value.
Hence the above difference lies in investment from broader patent law and that of the narrower patent law.
