Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou
rtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
never fired, usually on time, respectful of others and property The parole officer has more contact and responsibility to the judge than the probation officer does.
This article examines the effects of authoritarian populism on civil society ... We outline a selection of coping strategies used by organized civil ... In the late 1990s, civil society was highly involved in contesting the ... Started by a subset of CSOs in Ecuador, it not only represents a formalized response but
