1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
15

Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou

rtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Law
1 answer:
Burka [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

You might be interested in
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain what you would do to minimize the tailgating hazard
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

uh make a left? I'm not sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is NOT a reason why a dirt or gravel road can be
levacccp [35]

Answer:

B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
32. If you take sedatives, you could experience_
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

c. O blurred vision is the answer.

3 0
1 year ago
What is article 12 in the UAE law book?
Snezhnost [94]
Idk the answer sorry
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think capital punishment should be a viable sentencing option for heinous crimes
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

Yes, I feel as thou people who are found guilty of a heinous act need to be viable to capital punishment. I say this because the long term affect a crime like that can have on someone. It can cause serious damage and resault in self harm or worse for the victim/ victims familys. There is a never ending line of heinous crimes but being viable for capital sentencing may help stop that line.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps

Have A Great Day

~Zero~

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Asking questions, recognizing deception, recognizing verbal signals and nonverbal signals,
    10·1 answer
  • What is the arm signal for a left turn?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which people are likely to care about the US educational system? Check all that apply. citizens of other countries non-taxpaying
    10·2 answers
  • What is the main difference in our Constitution from other countries according to President Ronald Reagan?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the primary purpose of a health maintenance organization (HMO)?
    7·1 answer
  • If you realize there's alcohol or medication affecting your body you should
    7·2 answers
  • Right here god can u like
    5·1 answer
  • ¿quien resuelve las controversias en materia civil?
    14·2 answers
  • Where does a consumer learn about the credit card interest rates in the schumer box?
    13·1 answer
  • Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of t
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!