1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
2 years ago
15

Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou

rtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Law
1 answer:
Burka [1]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

You might be interested in
As you increase your use of alcohol and other drugs your ability to safely operate a motor vehicle decreases
Alekssandra [29.7K]
True. Increasing your intake of alcohol and drugs decreases your ability to operate a motor vehicle.
8 0
2 years ago
Hello Brainly Friends! I don't have a question but, I wanted to tell you that... I want you to subscribe to 3 channels. The name
pogonyaev
Answer:

I will subscribe!

Explanation:
8 0
2 years ago
Why were some of the framers opposed to the bill of rights
gavmur [86]
The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HURRY What countries were allied in World War I and opposed in World War II? Russia and Germany Germany and Britain France a
Dovator [93]

Answer:

The Allies of World War I or Entente Powers were a coalition of countries led by France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States against the Central Powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, and their colonies during the First World War (1914–1918).

By the end of the first decade of the 20th century, the major European powers were divided between the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. The Triple Entente was made up of France, Britain, and Russia. The Triple Alliance was originally composed of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy, but Italy remained neutral in 1914. As the war progressed, each coalition added new members. Japan joined the Entente in 1914 and after proclaiming its neutrality at the beginning of the war, Italy also joined the Entente in 1915. The term "Allies" became more widely used than "Entente", although the Principal Allies of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, and Japan were sometimes known also as Quintuple Entente.[1] The colonies administered by the countries that fought for the allies were also part of the Entente Powers such as British India, French Indochina, and Japanese Korea.

The United States joined in 1917 (the same year in which Russia withdrew from the conflict) as an "associated power" rather than an official ally. Other "associated members" included Serbia, Belgium, Montenegro, Asir, Nejd and Hasa, Portugal, Romania, Hejaz, Panama, Cuba, Greece, China, Siam (now Thailand), Brazil, Armenia, Luxembourg, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Haiti, Liberia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Honduras.[2] The treaties signed at the Paris Peace Conference recognised Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the United States as 'the Principal Allied and Associated.

3 0
2 years ago
What happens in collective bargining
Veronika [31]

Collective bargaining is the process in which working people, through their unions, negotiate contracts with their employers to determine their terms of employment, including pay, benefits, hours, leave, job health and safety policies, ways to balance work and family, and more. Collective bargaining is a way to solve workplace problems.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Ivan Jakovlevitch find in his breakfast bread?
    7·2 answers
  • 38. How many justices/judges are on the Supreme Court? *
    8·1 answer
  • Difinição Violencia domestica?
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME<br> I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
    12·1 answer
  • Pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
    14·2 answers
  • The plaintiff is suing the defendant for personal injuries suffered when she was struck by the defendant's car. The plaintiff te
    10·1 answer
  • A surgeon made a mistake during a complicated operation that led to
    7·2 answers
  • Reforms to law enforcement in the 1930s were intended to _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Which hate crime category is most likely to result in murder?
    9·2 answers
  • ***ECONOMICS***
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!