Answer:
66. (D)
67. (B)
68. (B)
69. (A)
70. (B)
I hope they're all right. Good luck.
Answer:
anybody else is the visual cortex
Lets see how good my typing skills will come to use now...
Hey friend!
I recently went on a school trip to Washington D.C. It was amazing and full of iconic monuments. I wished you were there, but your not in my school. You should have seen the white house! It's more than three stories high, though I'm not sure why its called a house because it looks more like a building. I hope you can come visit by sometime this year, maybe we could take a one hour drive down to Washington D.C sometime. Well anyways, see you friend.
Sincerely,
Whatever You Want Your Name To Be.
Brainliest or Heart if helpful for whatever your doing. You can always add more, and just combine it with other answers.
Also did this in 3 minutes so....your welcome.
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B.
</u>
Answer
When Barnaby Jack said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution,” he meant that sometimes, if there isn't a problem, there would be no reason to find a solution. By demoing a threat, then there would show that there is room for a problem, meaning there needs to be a way to fix it.
Explanation
Done