<span>o ask a still more obvious question, what is the purpose of this technological progress? What higher aim do we think it is serving? Surly the aim cannot be the integrity or happiness of our families, which we have made subordinate to the education system, the television industry, and the consumer economy. Surely it cannot be the integrity of health of out communities, which we esteem even less than we esteem our families. Surly it cannot be love of our country, for we are far more concerned about the desecration of the flag than we are about the desecration of our land. Surly it cannot be the love of God, which counts for at least as little in the daily order of business as the love of family, community, and country.</span>
<u>Answer:
</u>
A reaction in which the reactants have more energy than the products is always an Endothermic reaction.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The word "exothermic" means "turning out".In endothemic reaction, less amount of energy is sufficient to break the bonds that exist between the reactants when compared to the amount of energy that is formed when new bonds are created.
The chemical energy that is stored within a product is nothing but its potential energy that can later be released. An example of an endothermic reaction is the burning of wood. when you burn wood, you can see that it releases energy in the form of heat and this warms up the surrounding environment.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
Answer:
they were racist
Explanation:
but the real answer would be: i guess since they'd be free?
