Answer:
The overhead for the year was $130,075
Explanation:
GIVEN INFORMATION -
ESTIMATED ACTUAL
Manufacturing overhead $132,440 $128,600
Machine hours 2800 2750
Here for calculating the overhead for the year we will use the following formula =
\frac{Estimated Manufacturing Overhead}{Estiamted Machine Hours}\times Actual Machine Hours
= \frac{\$132,440}{2800}\times 2750
\$47.3\times 2750 = \$130,075
Therefore the overhead for the year was $130,075
False, standard rules doesn't exist to help managers identify appropriate allocation bases.
Standard Rules refers to strong moral commitments or ethics that allows smooth working of an organisation. It is basically fundamental requirements to govern an organisation. It could play a role in appropriate allocation bases but doesn't exist for it rather to keep check on principles and equality in an organisation. They are not legally binding. But, appropriate allocation bases require judgement. Managers use- the direct method or the sequential (or step) method or the reciprocal method, to develop judgements about allocation bases. Hence, the statement is false.
More on allocation of rsources brainly.com/question/5322091
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Common Terminology
Explanation:
NIMS establishes a common terminology to work cooperatively with other organizations in some emergency scenarios, this is used to avoid confusion.
The common terminology usually is implemented in Organizational Functions (named by standard names), Resource Descriptions (named by capabilities) and Incident Facilities (common terms for clarity in an incident)
Answer:
The answer is: $90,000
Explanation:
We must first determine the cost of goods sold:
- COGS = variable costs = 70% x 1,000,000
I will assume all fixed costs are operating expenses.
Then we elaborate a simple income statement:
Sales $1,000,000
<u>COGS ($700,000) </u>
Gross profit $300,000
<u>Operating expenses ($210,000) </u>
Operating profit $90,000
Please find full question attached
Answer and Explanation:
I will use Apple and HP in this comparison.Here I would compare Apple's laptop to that of Hewlet Packard as this is where they meet in the industry. Apple employs a strategy of differentiation and standing out in competition through their products. They aim to create products that are quite different and unique/innovative from other products in the market, and yet what the customer wants. In doing this, Apple has a trade-off for cost as they charge alot higher for their products than their competitors. HP on the other hand focus on making the best possible products that get the job done/meet the needs of customers while also being affordable. HP is more focused on affordable devices for their market and therefore have a different market segment for laptops from that of Apple. There is a trade-off for cost and market segment in this comparison
