<h3>Federalists were proponents of the Constitution.</h3>
The conditions that are directly related to the inability of the federal city to expand are 1.The populations of neighboring Vir-ginia and Maryland have increased dramatically and 3.An increasing number of federal agencies and offices have relocated to neighboring states and regional offices.
<h3>Why has Washington D.C. failed to expand?</h3>
One of the major reasons why Washington D.C. has failed to expand is that the populations of the neighboring states of Vir-ginia and Maryland have expanded which means that Washington D.C. cannot be allocated more space.
At the same time, federal agencies and offices have relocated to neighboring states which means that there is less need for the federal city to expand.
Full question is:
When Congress limited the size of Washington, DC to 10 square miles, they could not have predicted the growth of the federal bureaucracy. Which of the following conditions, do you suppose, is directly related to the inability of the federal city to expand? (Select all that apply.)
1.The populations of neighboring Vir-ginia and Maryland have increased dramatically.
2.Many government workers must commute relatively long distances to get to work every day.
3.An increasing number of federal agencies and offices have relocated to neighboring states and regional offices.
4.Washington, DC has maintained a small town culture with few large buildings or busy streets
Find out more on Washington D.C. at brainly.com/question/13835376
#SPJ1
Reformation. Others such as renaissance and enlightenment put heavy stress on the humanities and sciences.
The Indian case of attaining self rule is one of the most read nationalism stories in the world. the movement was led by Gandhi who advocated for use of peaceful means of attaining independence. Gandhi was against violent conflicts and whenever violent protests broke out,he would go on hunger strikes. Gandhi methods however would not have been successful were it not for the changing global dynamics resulting from the ww2.
One I would have thought was not protected by the 1st Amendment would have been hate literature. Wrong. Hate is protected. So is something like treason unless it incites violence.
The things that fall outside protection by the 1st Amendment are
Unsuitable pictures of children
Violence or the true threat of violence.
Obscenity (obviously it has not been enforced. Or it's been tried and failed).
defamation
These and not rigid exceptions. There are tests to determine if something is or is not protected by the first amendment.