Yes, they were legitimate because there should be no taxation without representation. Many of the things they were being taxed on were used heavily succh as paper and tea.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above is the term "HISTORICAL". Here is the complete answer. <span>President George Washington took the oath of office on April 30, 1789. Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as president on March 4, 1861. These events are an example of historical chronology. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
A. The explosion of a nuclear reactor killed 30 people
Explanation: hope this helps :)
Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.
Explanation:
The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.
The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.
This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.
The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore
