Answer:
D. Associative Property
Step-by-step explanation:
The group is being switched around.
Answer:
Ignacio can make 5 clockwise rotations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the Ignacio's legs are already at a height of 49.3cm and each rotation of the chair knob raises his legs another 4.8cm, we can set up an inequality to determine the number of rotations Ignacio could make without his legs touching the desk, which is at a height of 74.5cm:
4.8r + 49.3 < 74.5 where 'r' is equal to the number of rotations
The sum of the Ignacio's original leg height plus the amount of height increased from the rotations of the know must be less than 74.5 in order for his legs not to touch. Now, solve for 'r':
Subtract 49.3 from both sides: 4.8r + 49.3 - 49.3 < 74.5 - 49.3 or 4.8r < 25.2
Divide 4.8 from both sides: 4.8r/4.8 < 25.2/4.8 or r < 5.25
Since the number of rotations must be less than 5.25, he can make 5 complete rotations.
Answer:
12.5
Step-by-step explanation:
you can solve this by dividing 250/20=12.5
All you have to do here is some simplifying.
6/12 = what
6 divided by 12 = 1/2
1/2 = 2/4
There! We have our missing value
6/12 = 2/4
Answer: c = 4
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.