Which statement describes something quantitative?

The disease bullous pemphigoid results in the destruction of proteins within the basement membrane that holds the epidermis and

SVETLANKA909090 [29]

This would directly affect the epidermis because blisters will develop within the surface of the skin. Having blisters on the epidermis will decrease the function of the skin to be an effective barrier to disease. This is because blisters are open wounds that are prone to infection. As infection passes through these openings, it will affect the dermis and the other layers of the skin. Bullae is actually an auto-immune skin disease.

6 0

3 years ago

You shoot a deer. you do not see it go down. how long should you wait before trailing the deer? half an hour two hours half a da

svp [43]

You should wait at least half an hour before trailing the deer. You should try to watch carefully and see which way it goes. Chasing a wounded animal yields meat that tastes gamey, so try not to chase. When you do trail, follow the blood trail. Listen carefully while you wait and try to hear where the deer is or if it goes down.

7 0

3 years ago

About how much energy is transferred from a primary consumer to a sencondary consumer

stepladder [879]

c. 10% primary energy

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

100 POINTS IF CORRECT!!!

Yuliya22 [10]

From a Punnett square you can get the genotypic and phenotypic proportions of the progeny produced from a cross. Cross: PpRr x PpRr. F1: PPRR, PPRr, PPRr, PPrr, PpRr, Pprr, ppRR, ppRr, pprr.

<h3>What is a Punnett square?</h3>

The Punnett square is a graphic representation that shows the different types of gamete combinations according to the alleles involved in a cross.

Punnett square shows the probabilities of getting offspring with different genotypes and their consequent phenotypes.

In the exposed example, we know that two genes are involved in the cross.

As we can see, there are dominant and recessive alleles for both genes.

Since each genotype in the square results from the combination of parental gametes, we can figure out which are the parental genotypes.

For instance, let us consider the provided genotypes

PPRr.

We can assume one of the parents provided a P and a R dominant alleles, while the other parent provided another P allele but a r recessive allele.

PR + Pr ⇒ PPRr

ppRr.

One of the parents provided a p recessive allele and a R dominant allele, The other parent provided another p allele and a r recessive allele.

pR + pr ⇒ ppRr

pprr.

Both parents provided p and r recessive alleles.

pr + pr ⇒ pprr

From this information, we can assume parents are heterozygous for both genes.

Cross:

Parentals) PpRr x PpRr

Gametes) PR, Pr, pR, pr PR, Pr, pR, pr

Punnett square) PR Pr pR pr

PR PPRR PPRr PpRR PpRr

Pr PPRr PPrr PpRr Pprr

pR PpRR PpRr ppRR ppRr

pr PpRr Pprr ppRr pprr

F1) 1/16 individuals are expected to be PPRR

2/16 individuals are epected to be PPRr

1/16 individuals are expected to be PPrr

2/16 individuals are expected to be PpRR

4/16 individuals are expected to be PpRr

2/16 individuals are expected to be Pprr

1/16 individuals are expected to be ppRR

2/16 individuals are expected to be ppRr

1/16 individuals are expected to be pprr

For a better understanding, you will find the Punnett square in the attached files representing the parental gametes with different colors, and the resulting genotypes with a combination of these colors.

In this way, you will notice which gamete comes from which parent.

You can learn more about Punnett squares at

brainly.com/question/25357981

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

What is the differences between nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA?

oee [108]

Answer:

Believe it or not, mitochondria are their own organisms!

That’s right, they are single celled living beings that hitch a ride inside our cells for security, and in return they make our energy systems run much better than they would. This arrangement started a very long time ago, before we split from our last ancestor with plants, and long before we became multicellular. Other than this arrangement, our DNA has nothing to do with the DNA of the mitochondria (other than synergistic evolution making us more compatible with one another).

For this reason, it is easy to see how mitochondrial DNA differs from nuclear DNA.

First major difference is that we are in different kingdoms and even different super kingdoms to mitochondria (I know there are only meant to be 5 kingdoms but in biology people often use a system based off genetic differences, leading to a huge array of kingdoms that are often really distantly related). So our DNA and mitochondrial DNA share very few similarities. We both replicate our DNA using the same method and have the same base pairs, but the DNA itself says different things.

Another difference is that mitochondria generations are very fast compared to humans’, so their DNA undergoes genetic drift at a much faster rate, and changes more over time. Therefore it is much easier to locate recent changes in populations, for example the migrations out of Africa in the last 200,000 years, or the ethnic backgrounds of different African races, using mitochondrial DNA. In contrast nuclear DNA has fewer fine mutations that can be used as a map for recent events (in the last million years, say).

Mitochondria are passed down from mother to child in animals, so you will always have your mother’s mitochondrial DNA. This is why there is a mitochondrial Eve- this is the last female that is an ancestor of everyone on the planet, and therefore every human possesses direct ancestors of her mitochondria (and her nuclear DNA). In contrast we receive a 50/50 split of nuclear DNA from father and mother.

I hope this helps!

7 0

2 years ago