Answer:
yes it is the government can write a letter to the editor
Explanation:
this is because there is a law that says that if someone online says something about the presedit the presidit can not do anything because i belive it is the right to speech or say something you do not like about him or her
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Explanation:
Yes someone can bring it to appeal court if he or she is unhappy with the verdict
What is the company from?? What do they sell??
Answer:
The answer is c "It is a crime even if the extortion message is sent either unwillingly or without the knowledge of the sender."
Explanation:
Extortion, in most countries, means obtaining something by coercion or threat. Thus, if a message is sent through a mobile phone of someone with the person's knowledge or not, then an act of extortion may have been established. The onus is on the owner of the phone to prove innocence of sending such message in the first place while he may be charged with extortion as the case is established.
