1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
2 years ago
13

Settlement payment from carnell smith and lenox magee v. fifth third bank class action settlement

Law
1 answer:
Igoryamba2 years ago
8 0

In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.

The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.

In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.

Explanation:

According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.

7 0
2 years ago
4
Bond [772]

Answer:

The CORRECT answer is A. Automated logistical specialist

Explanation:

The technical term used for this role is 92A Automated Logistical Specialist

Hopefully this helps!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!

6 0
2 years ago
Chapter Quiz
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

20percent

Explanation:

20 percentage

4 0
3 years ago
About one in every ten drivers?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

Is left handed

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a basic element of communication?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer: It would be C.) Thought Process!

Explanation: Hope That Helped Love!<3

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • the constitución requires the national government to gurantee to every statein this union republication form of government
    6·1 answer
  • What is true of public service?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the goverment put out untested nicotine devices
    6·1 answer
  • Hsjdhdvdjdudhdbdbdbdudhdhrjevehd
    10·2 answers
  • Who can obtain a search warrant for a crime scene?
    10·1 answer
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce
    8·1 answer
  • Need help ASAP ! I’ll give you a heart
    14·2 answers
  • The right to privacy stems from the _____ found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
    15·1 answer
  • Help please I’ll give brainlest
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!