Answer:
The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, and is the party of unequal treatment based on race, rather than equal opportunity based on merit.
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson was related to the Democratic Party, as it was widely known with it's history of impeding on people's rights based on skin-color or national origin. He also was the embodiment of many of the beliefs of the Democratic Party. Firstly, he embraced the usage of slavery, and was a ardent holder of slaves. The Democratic Party had always worked for keeping the institution of slavery as a means of not only workforce and profit, but also as a way to degrade "non-whites" into being second-class humans, (also commonly known as sub-humans). Piggy-backing off of the issue of slavery, Jackson also campaigned against many of the Native American tribes that were located to the west of the then-US, starting wars and taking lands from the defeated Native American tribes. Again, the Native American tribes were classified as sub-humans, and did not receive any benefits that would generally be implied to a white-US citizen.
This led to the unpopularity of Jackson within the Whig-Republican circles, and he was succeeded by Martin van Buren.
The Meiji government began building schools in most Japanese towns and villages in the late 1800s because o<span>fficials knew that modernization required an educated workforce. Then the answer is B. It improved the education system in Japan at that time.
</span>
The correct answer of the given question above would be option D. The Dred Scott decision influenced the presidential elections of 1860 since the decision strengthened the Republican Party, which won the election. This <span>outcry over the Dred Scott decision urged Northerners to vote Republican, to represent their stance against slavery, by electing Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States in 1860. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Among the key changes brought by the Hart-Celler Act: Quotas based on nation of origin were abolished. For the first time since the National Origins Quota system went into effect in 1921, the national origin was no longer a barrier to immigration.
Answer:
political and government power?
Explanation: