Women now have only three-quarters of the legal rights that males have. It was less than half in 1970. Our latest endeavor to document how laws have changed from 1970 yielded the Women, Business, and the Law 2020 report. This unique dataset has already aided groundbreaking research, demonstrating that a country's success on the Women, Business and the Law index is linked to more women in the labor force, a reduced salary gap between men and women, and more investments in health and education.
An examination of 1,518 reforms spanning 50 years and 190 economies reveals some intriguing findings. To begin with, tremendous progress has been accomplished globally. Second, change has progressed at different rates in different parts of the country. The OECD high-income and Sub-Saharan Africa areas have made the most progress in terms of reform volume and average WBL index score improvement.
The third noteworthy result is that progress has been uneven throughout the eight legal domains studied by Women, Business, and the Law. The majority of reforms were in the areas of worker protections and regulations affecting working parents. Despite the improvements made, there is still more to be done.
Over the years, the feminist movement has made significant progress. Despite the fact that women have had the right to vote for more than a century, the sad reality is that we still have a long way to go. Despite the fact that the definition of feminism is unarguable—an effort to ensure that every woman and every individual has rights equal to those of a cis white man, regardless of race, religion, gender identification, sexual preference, or anything else—"feminism" continues to be a contentious term.
Women still do not have the same rights as males under the United States Constitution. The United States is not only the only developed country that has not ratified the Equal Rights Amendment, but it is also the only developed country that has not ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
<h2>The extremists supporting Islamic law had great impact on young women like Marji. </h2>
Explanation:
In 1979 many laws were forced onto women that marked the beginning of the Islamic Revolution. According to the Iranian government, certain rules that are oppressive and discriminatory should be followed by the women.
Marjane Satrapi, a young Iranian girl was asked by her mother to be careful when walking in the road and she can’t be rebellious.
The young women were forced under this persecution to wear the veil and the education for girls were restricted. They were also stopped from dreaming and travelling. The veil was a symbol for oppression and separation.
Answer:
to show how the narrator tries to persuade his/her father to let him/her become an artist
to show the narrator's childhood dream
Explanation:
The narrator Made use of flashback in to show in other to narrate what his dream was, as what he eventually became wasn't what he has always dreamt of becoming, so the narrator utilized flashback to take the readers through his childhood desire and aspiration. A natural desire which never manifested because his father never believed in his dream.
During the narrator's flashback, he showcased how he tried to fish his way into pursuing his dream, as a child, All he could do was to persuade his father into supporting him on his dreams, which also proved futile.
The expression, a chip off the old block means that people who resemble their parents in some way. For example, you could say <span>“Mark just won the same sailboat race his father won twenty years ago; he's a </span>chip off the old block<span>.”</span>
This site is only for answering or asking questions but thanks! I hope you have a great day! And if you have an english question, I would be happy to help! ☺
