Answer:
Check below for the answers and explanations
Explanation:
1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.
Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.
2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed
3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.
4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.
5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.
Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.
6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.
Answer:
The option that runs contrary to the classical theory of criminology is (A) Punishment should be certain
Explanation:
The key principle of Classical theory Of Criminology are
- <u>Rationality</u>:-This principle states that people commit crime at their own wish/will.
- <u>Hedonism</u>:The principle of hedoism states that people seek pleasure and minimize their pain by committing crime.
- <u>Punishment </u>:As per this principle punishment work as a deterrent to crime.
- <u>Human Right:</u>This principle states that the punishment given should not be harsh rather it should be swift.
The answer of the above question is (A) Punishments should be certain.
Answer:
1. It made a Unilateral mistake
2. It cannot be voided by the cruise line
Explanation:
This cruise line has made a Unilateral mistake in this scenario.
In terms of the law, this cruise line does not have the power to void the transaction on its own accord in the normal course of business. but it has the right to plea in a law court that it did this business transaction sale based on non availability of complete price quote and also that there was a unilateral mistake of facts. It will also have to make a case that the sale was caused by the buyer who tried to benefit from the mistake through misrepresentation and omissions.
The court would then decide on the case at it own discretion.
Answer:
a current or former spouse.
a child of a current or former spouse.
a person with whom the offender has a child or children.
a foster child or foster parent of the offender.
Explanation:
I like the first photo a lot get it girlll
