1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vesna_86 [32]
3 years ago
10

The Police Department has hired you as a consultant in a robbery investigation. A thief allegedly robbed a bank and, to escape t

he pursing security guards, took the express elevator to the roof of the building. Then, in order to not be caught with the evidence, the thief allegedly threw the money bag to a waiting accomplice on the roof of the next building. The defense attorney contends that in order to reach the roof of that next building, the defendant would have had to throw the money bag horizontally with a minimum velocity of 10 meters/second. However, in a test, the accused could throw the bag with a maximum horizontal velocity of no more than 5 meters/second. How will you advise the prosecuting attorney
Law
1 answer:
levacccp [35]3 years ago
3 0
The vertical distance between the roofs of the two buildings is 150 meters. Let’s use the equation below to determine the time required for the bag to drop 150 meters.

d = vi * t + ½ * 9.8 * t^2, d = 150 m
Since the bag is thrown horizontally, the initial vertical velocity is 0 m/s.
150 = ½ * 9.8 * t^2, t = √(150/4.9) ≈ 5.53 seconds

We can use the time to determine the minimum horizontal velocity required for the bag to travel 20 meters.
v = 20 ÷ √(150/4.9) ≈ 3.61 m/s

Since this velocity is less than 5 m/s. I believe that the bag to accused could throw the bag to the accomplice. I would advise the prosecuting attorney to do some pleas bargaining to get the accused the best deal possible. The accused is GUILTY!
You might be interested in
The fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a
Katen [24]

The fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.

<h3>What is a constitution?</h3>

Constitution is a legal document, which contains the principles and procedures by which a country is being governed.

Hence, the fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.

Learn more about constitution here : brainly.com/question/470736

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
What if the defendant later admits that they did in fact kill the victim. Are they getting away with murder or could there be an
Sveta_85 [38]

There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)

Explanation:

In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.

The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.

4 0
3 years ago
Three roles and responsibilities the prime minister of Canada has ?anyone ??? Is for right now
Finger [1]
I don’t know I don’t wanna was the day I gotta was a good morning I gotta was a good day I gotta was a good day I
8 0
3 years ago
Coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists all _____.
FinnZ [79.3K]
Work in cases of sudden death investigation
3 0
2 years ago
If you are married and your partner commits a crime, what is your responsibility as a witness in the trial of your husband or wi
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A part 36 offer may be made at anytime,including before prceedings have commenced
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the second continental congress, when drafting the articles of confederation, create a weak central government?
    6·2 answers
  • What is law and where does law come from ?
    6·1 answer
  • When driving during the daytime in reduced visibility, such as rain, smoke, or fog,
    5·2 answers
  • Por que los derechos humanos son imprescriptibles​
    9·1 answer
  • I will give brainliest to the person who makes me laugh. :) No links, just funny stuff XD
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago
    9·1 answer
  • Permitting rental agencies to refuse to rent apartments to families with children would violate what kind of due process?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is a responsibility of an American Citizen?
    15·1 answer
  • What is NOT a way to lower your risk of drowsy driving?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!