1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zheka24 [161]
3 years ago
13

2. Solve for x. More than one answer may be correct. Select all correct choices.*

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
shtirl [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

None of these are correct

The value x = 35 is correct

Explanation:

<u><em>Step(i):</em></u>-

Given

         log^{2} _{10} + log^{(x+5)} _{10} = 2

We will apply logarithmic formula

log(a) + log (b) = log a b

  logₓ a = b

⇒   a = xᵇ

<u><em>Step(ii)</em></u>:-

       log^{2} _{10} + log^{(x+5)} _{10} = 2

    log^{2(x+15)} _{10} = 2

⇒  2 ( x + 15 ) = 10²

⇒ 2 x + 30 = 100

⇒  2 x = 70

⇒  x = 35

<u><em>Final answer:-</em></u>

x = 35

<u><em>Verification:-</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

 log^{2} _{10} + log^{(x+5)} _{10} = 2

    log^{2(35+15)} _{10} = 2

   log^{(100)} _{10} = 2

  log^{(10)^{2} } _{10} = 2

log x ⁿ = n log x

2 log¹⁰ ₁₀     = 2

2 =  2       (  log¹⁰ ₁₀ = 1

You might be interested in
How did the Reformation change the role of women in Europe?
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

The status of women in the Protestant Reformation was the role of wife and mother, just as the men's role was that of husband, father, or son.

Explanation:

The status of women in the Protestant Reformation was the role of wife and mother, just as the men's role was that of husband, father, or son.

5 0
3 years ago
What are the events of the namesake movie about? Describe in minute detail.
il63 [147K]

Answer: Plot

Explanation:The Namesake depicts the struggles of Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli (Irrfan Khan and Tabu), first-generation immigrants from the East Indian state of West Bengal to the United States, and their American-born children Gogol (Kal Penn) and Sonia (Sahira Nair).

8 0
3 years ago
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with ap government
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Chaos would happen and one branch will always have more power over the other branch. If they are all together, what is right and what is wrong. Is too much power being used? What laws to make? What actions to make? IF for not these questions perhaps, there would have been only one branch of the government. The executive branch has immense power and can be overpowered as well, but, that does not mean it can do any foolishness it wants. That is why the judicial branch exists and it has specific power, great power, to overrule anything if it is deemed wrong or unconsitituional. The president doesn't necessarily create law either. He writes them into law and may have some power or influence to add in laws he likes or wants. The legislative branch looks over the laws and creates them. The president merely looks over it and signs it. The judical branch also has the power to overrule laws that are unjust or unconstitutional. Together, these three branches make up the government. Without each other, or to be said, as single, the nation would be no more.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What type of organisms are represented by the three types of curves?
Fed [463]

Answer:

1. humans

2. birds

3. trees/plants

Explanation:

1. more die as time goes on

2. all die at a constant rate

3. most die at the beginning but those that survive live long

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HURRY! Why did General Sherman undertake his "March to the Sea"?
    7·2 answers
  • Explain how did early cities differ from neolithic villages and towns
    6·1 answer
  • Women are more likely than men to support all of the following EXCEPT Select one: a. same-sex marriage. b. environmental protect
    15·1 answer
  • The dependent variable causes a change in (the) ________________.
    15·1 answer
  • In what form does the sun's energy arrive on Earth?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about grasslands? A) They have numerous trees. B) They have a large number of tree-dwelling birds
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following shows the correct order of the energy transformations that occur when green plants produce their food fro
    5·1 answer
  • I love the show wordgirl and totally think you should watch it. Do not put any negative comments on this question for i do not c
    5·2 answers
  • Read: Kang, Should Athletes Stick to Sports?
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following essay written by Christopher Morley in 1920. Annotate it or create a graphic organizer; generate some questio
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!