The person that inspires me is my family
The logical fallacy which occurs in this case is a fallacy called Causal Fallacy, which in short words is when you explain something with the not necessarily true cause. this is calledin latin <em>non causa pro causa</em> which means,this is not cause for this cause. For example, people see a sports car crashed on the street. Immediately they blame the sports car driver for driving too fast. This is a false cause, because despite a sports car can be fast, that was not necessarily the cause of the accident.
Answer:
the stated goal is persuasive rather than informative
Explanation:
This is because the stated goal is persuasive rather than informative. By using the words "should be" you are stating that you are trying to convince them and this completely changes the goal of the message into a persuasive one. If your goal for the message was to be informative you would instead only talk about the replay system, its features, and all that it has to offer so that the viewer can know everything there is to know about the system itself. Thus becoming informed, and they can make their own decisions about whether or not to implement it later.
Answer:
I honestly don't know lol why?
Answer is D.
The answer is D. because when you remove any other words the sentence doesn’t make sense , it’s also the answer because you can infer that it will be done in a year from the present.
