1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
2 years ago
7

Why did President Reagan try to reduce the size of government by eliminating programs?

History
2 answers:
zheka24 [161]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

he believed it was a key to economic growth

Explanation:

Ray Of Light [21]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

he believed it was a key to economic growth

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were Americans susceptible to fear-based politics in the early 1950s?
Temka [501]

Answer:

In the 1950s, Americans were afraid of communism because of the widespread belief that communist ideology would infect the country and persuade citizens to turn against democracy and capitalism. This rampant fear and suspicion caused many people to dread not only communism, but being accused of communist sympathies themselves. Americans also feared communism in the form of the Soviet Union, a communist, rival country which had proven itself a viable military threat through its nuclear weapons program.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the second step in writing an argumentative essay? A. Refuting a counterclaim B. Synthesizing your conclusions C. Descri
dalvyx [7]
Introducing a claim
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What prior knowledge can you apply to this passage? People can change—but they don’t always like it Humans are amazing in how ad
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Through effective electronic communication students can establish new friendships and tackle difficult problems from the viewpoint of students from different cultures. Pupils and staff gain first-hand knowledge of other education systems, customs and the reality of life in a country different from their own.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Local law defines the speed limit as 45 miles per hour on local roads. The law outlines punishments by charging fines for those
Levart [38]

This is a matter of Criminal Law.When you break a law, you are committing a crime. When you break a law, you have a legal punishment. The penalty increases the faster the person travels above the speed limit. The most severe punishments are for those who travel faster than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit.

The law is intended to protect people's safety.The source of the law is a statute – a written law that tells us what to do and what not to do. Since it is a local law that “outlines punishments,” it is also a municipal law.

Many people will be killed on the road if speed limit is not followed.he purpose of the law is to stop people from speeding. Speeding can cause accidents that hurt the driver or other people. The faster you go increases the risk of an accident. The law is intended to protect people’s safety. If it did not exist, people could drive whatever speed they wanted. They could drive 100 mph in a school zone. In the scenario, he was driving 22 mph over the speed limit and his wife and unborn child were in the car. He could have had an accident and killed all of them.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Comparing Federalist and Anti-Federalist Positions
OleMash [197]

The interest group that voiced opinions on ratifying the constitution and establishing a more powerful central government was known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

<h3>Who are the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?</h3>

A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.

In contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the Federalists stood for those who favored the establishment of a more powerful federal government.

Because they believed that state constitutions already protected individual rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed a bill of rights in the Constitution.

In exchange for their approval, the Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights.

To ensure that the rights would not be revoked by the new federal government, the Anti-Federalists insisted that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution.

To learn more about Anti-Federalists, visit:

brainly.com/question/28622723

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Thomas Jefferson made some revisions to the virginia plan
    13·1 answer
  • Who were the federalist and republicans for presidents in the election of 1800
    9·2 answers
  • When and where did judaism become popular
    14·1 answer
  • Gallup Poll® and the Harris Poll® are two organizations that _______.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of these was NOT a
    9·2 answers
  • Which two countries have communist governments?
    13·2 answers
  • In late 1997, president mandela __________ as leader of the african national congress.
    14·1 answer
  • Uhm the questions speak for themselves and please answer within the next 1 hr and 30 mins
    6·2 answers
  • Refer to the passage.
    7·2 answers
  • Germany stated that which of the following
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!