Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
um i don't know this (i do im just lazy as heck)
Step-by-step explanation:
Kyle received 60/100 on his algebra test. If he scored 3 points, how many points was the test out of? Answer is 5.
Answer:
the vertex is (-1,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
W=2L
P=300=2(L+W)
so
300=2(L+W)
divide by 2
150=L+W
W=2L
subsitute
150=L+2L
150=3L
divide by 3
50=L
sub back
W=2L
W=2(50)
W=100
the field is 100yd wide by 50yd long