Answer:
Voters can be overwhelmed and vote by randomly guessing.
It puts too much of the onus of learning about the issues and candidates on voters.
It can include, state, local, municipal, national and federal candidates.
Explanation:
there where no answer choses but this is what i got
Answer:
An arms race denotes a rapid increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military power by rival states in peacetime. The first modern arms race took place when France and Russia challenged the naval superiority of Britain in the late nineteenth century. Germany’s attempt to surpass Britain’s fleet spilled over into World War I, while tensions after the war between the United States, Britain and Japan resulted in the first major arms-limitation treaty at the Washington Conference. The buildup of arms was also a characteristic of the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, though the development of nuclear weapons changed the stakes for the par
Over the past century, the arms race metaphor has assumed a prominent place in public discussion of military affairs. But even more than the other colorful metaphors of security studies–balance of power, escalation, and the like–it may cloud rather than clarify understanding of the dynamics of international rivalries.
An arms race denotes a rapid, competitive increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military or naval power by rival states in peacetime. What it connotes is a game with a logic of its own. Typically, in popular depictions of arms races, the political calculations that start and regulate the pace of the game remain obscure. As Charles H. Fairbanks, Jr., has noted, “The strange result is that the activity of the other side, and not one’s own resources, plans, and motives, becomes the determinant of one’s behavior.” And what constitutes the “finish line” of the game is the province of assertion, rather than analysis. Many onlookers, and some participants, have claimed that the likelihood of war increases as the accumulation of arms proceeds apace.
Explanation:
Contrary to the previous answer to this question, Roman culture very much lived on.As the Western Roman Empire neared its end the Barbarians became "Romanized" in a sense much more than the Romans became "barbarized".
This will make you pass!
Answer:1 They could rest assured that their food supply was more stable and constant if they planted consistently. To do this they learned to observe the stars and seasons to be ready for planting and harvesting. They fought over and secured land that was arable and then protected it with military might to protect their food supply. To that end.....
2 the early farmers became specialized in their labor and became potters, tanners, government leaders, accountants (well, they could count anyway!) and the myriad of other jobs that a modern community needed to survive. They took time to learn their tasks (education) and practiced those in communities governed by those whom they empowered. By the time you get to ancient Egypt, the range of jobs was pretty diverse for this largest and most successful agrarian society.
3 Early farmers also began to think seriously about continuity and a lasting society, so they worked hard on laws and taught their children respect for their society. Then they thought about the need for more land and growing the size of their kingdoms to ensure its permanence.
Explanation:
The two ways which the Reformation changed Europe is:
1) Henry 8th split the English church away from the pope. but this was an argument about succession and power and not move towards Protestantism. He remained Catholic the rest of his life.
2) Elizabeth 1 first tried to follow a 'middle way' in religion, but later began to persecute Catholics by end of the reign England was a protestant county.
{I'm not sure if this is right as I never learned the topic yet. but I hope this will try and help you. If you're still stuck the answers are the BBC bitesize KS3 history on the Tudors and stuarts}
