A company making profit from genetically modified potatoes would probably only say good things about genetically modified profits, so they'd likely be biased.
A book written by a freelance author whose previous books were about other scientific issues would likely have the book about genetic modification in general, rather than the historical development of it, so his book wouldn't be the best source to use.
A book written by a woman who believes she got sick from genetically modified products would probably be biased against genetically modified products, so her book wouldn't be the best source.
A book written by a scientist who helped develop the technology to genetically modify vegetables would probably know a lot about the historical development, considering he helped develop it. This is the best source to use in my opinion.
Answer:
I would say the first sentence.
Explanation:
The explanation of the lack of food gives you a better idea of the food scarcity and the level of poverty due to the war. Whereas the second sentence, yes demonstrates high levels of stress, but doesn't necessarily have to do with a war setting.
The correct answer among all the other choices is B.) The family of president Jones enjoyed a vacation. This sentence contains a capitalization error. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
