Answer: If a piece of art is considered utilitarian, then it has a purpose or use. Although it may have a purpose, it may still be beautiful and the process necessary to create the piece can be respects and admired. If this is the case, a piece can be considered both utilitarian and fine art.
Explanation:
So these debates are usually over virtue ethics (basically what you value, how you value things etc.). One debate is between the philosophy of utilitarianism and deontology (consequentialism vs means based). Social problems and issues are often times evaluated under particular values. For (a simple) ex. a utilitarian would value implementing a policy to save the most people whereas a deontologist wouldn’t look to save the most people if it meant infringing on the rights of the individual. So a utilitarian would care more about extinction then the most gruesome possible death of one person. Hope this helps!
I would say a c and d hope this helps
Answer:
I believe it is unique as to how much that one painting was able to bring in, It is abstract, and very enthusiastic in what and how it looks. It shows feeling and emotion in how the artist painted. That is my personally opinion on it.
Explanation:
Debra is more likely than Rachel to be involved in physical activity. Since there are boys in her group, the group would usually be doing physical activity.
