1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zepler [3.9K]
2 years ago
7

Which of the following were the outcomes of the court cases in the reading?

History
2 answers:
yKpoI14uk [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B, C, D

Explanation:

Contact [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B, C, D

Explanation:

got it right on edge

You might be interested in
What are some ways congress can check the executive branch
ELEN [110]
Congress can check the branches. Congress makes sure that the power stays equal between each branch
4 0
3 years ago
A citizen group wants to open a new youth center. It has chosen a location that the city has set aside for new houses in its zon
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer: I think the answer is the A: Determining the solution and criteria

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was true of the government under the Roman Empire?
Mazyrski [523]
Answer: The government was ruled by one leader.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Describe the various attempts at labor organization in this era, from the Molly Maguires to the Knights of Labor and American Fe
Pie

Answer:

Modern labor unions arose in the United States in the 1800s as increasing numbers of Americans took jobs in the factories, mines, and mills of the growing industrial economy during the Industrial Revolution. For the first one hundred years of its history, the United States had been a nation composed mainly of small farmers, but the economy had shifted to industry. For the first time in the country's history, more people worked for other people for wages than for themselves as farmers or craftsmen start superscript, 1, end superscript in these early years of industrial capitalism, government played little to no role in regulating businesses. Monopolies could set prices for goods and services as high as they liked. Likewise, industries could conspire to keep workers' wages low. Wealthy business owners routinely bribed judges and members of Congress to side with them in disputes. With such enormous resources at their disposal, business owners could easily overpower any individual worker who might complain about his or her treatment.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Locating Places
    13·1 answer
  • Identify reasons for the rise of nativism in the 1920s and 1930s.
    12·1 answer
  • What was the colonists reaction to the administration of justice act?
    9·1 answer
  • Imagine that you have discovered a restaurant that makes the best pizza you have ever tasted. Create a demand schedule showing h
    15·1 answer
  • The first european to sail around the cape of africa, __________ , allowed the portuguese to eventually colonize the indian ocea
    5·2 answers
  • One major effect of napoleons ruleof france was that it led to
    15·1 answer
  • If you place a crystal substance on a tabletop, return to view it after some time passes, and find it as a powdered substance, w
    12·2 answers
  • Why would a defendant agree to a plea bargain? A) to prove his or her innocence B) to have a lesser charge applied to him or her
    12·2 answers
  • What was the Great Leap Forward, and why was it disastrous?
    6·1 answer
  • Which geographical feature,made of large treeless areas and tall grass can be found in the Great Plains of the u.s
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!