No problem, hope you got help
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The getaway driver will most likely be forind guilty as they are both involved in the burglary theft just only for his partner to cart away additional stuff (cocaine) what chbwas not part of the initial agreement. However, one thing still remains, which is that the getaway driver and the cocaine thief acted together in other to perform an unlawful burglary. What the getaway driver is being charged for is being an accomplice which he actually his just not on the theft of cocaine. But that the only way he could be cleared of being an accomplice on cocaine theft is for the other thief to confess which will still lead them into another court case.
<h2>Hope this helps you with your homework :)</h2>
<u>Answer:
</u>
It can be said that the student version exemplifies paraphrasing plagiarism.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The contexts of the texts given above under the titles original source material and student version are clearly the same.
- It can be observed that most words used in both texts are the same but the arrangement of the words is different.
- To retain the meaning of the text but still make the text look different, the formation of the sentences has been made differently using the same words.
- Hence, it can be called an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.
