A is the answer to this question...
Leo is committing a fallacy called a red herring, which is a device in an argument that detracts the opponent from relevant issue. By saying that Scandinavian countries produce less carbon emissions than the US, he's either deliberately or inadvertently distracting Annie away from the fact that whether or not Scandinavian countries produce emissions matter, what matters in this context is that the US will receive less economical benefits from decreasing carbon emissions. By mentioning the state of Scandinavian countries, he pulling her away from the main topic at hand: effects of decrease of carbon emissions on the economy of the US alone.
One of the shortcomings of the Agricultural Adjustment Act was that "<span>-it did little for sharecroppers and tenant farmers" since these workers were usually paid in fixed amounts that didn't fluctuate with the market.</span>
Answer:
The reasons for African colonisation were mainly economic, political and religious.
These countries became involved in a race to acquire more territory on the African continent, but this race was open to all European countries.
Britain had had some success in halting the slave trade around the shores of Africa.
Answer C) Embargo.
Explanation : An embargo is an official order forbidding trade. Of those dangerous toys.
Hope this helps!
