The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
Answer:
A) Marginal private cost= 50
B) Total Marginal social cost to society = 70
Explanation:
A) In order to find the marginal private cost we will use the firms production cost formula as it is the private cost that the firm is enduring and is only relevant to the firm's cost and not the society's cost.
In order to find the marginal unit cost of the 10th unit produced will will replace Q in the formula by 10 as it represents quantity.
MC= 10 + 4Q
MC= 10 + 4(10)
MC= 10 +40 = 50
B) In order to find the marginal cost to society we will add the marginal external cost of the 10th unit to its private cost. We already know the marginal private cost is 50 now we need to find the marginal external cost to it to find the total marginal cost.
Marginal external cost = 2Q
Q= 10
Marginal external cost = 2*10 =20
The total Marginal cost to society= 50 + 20= 70
Answer:
D, product-communication adaptation
Explanation:
Product adaptation can be defined as the process of modifying a product to make it useful for a variety of users.
Communication adaptation can also be defined as the change in a product's communication as a result of a change in product strategy.
Product-communication adaptation can be defined as the modification of a product for a variety of users but ensuring that the marketing of the product is through standard communication channels.
In the case of Campbell adapted his product to look like M'm M'm Good product but ensured that he used a standard communication channel (ads) to market his product.
Cheers.
Answer: $7,740
Explanation:
Given, At December 31, Accounts receivable = $238,000
Allowance for uncollectible accounts = 3% of (accounts receivable)
∴ Allowance for uncollectible accounts = 3% of ($238,000 )
=$(0.03 ×238,000) [3% = 0.03]
= $ (7140)
= $7,140
Allowance for uncollectible accounts (credit) before any adjustments= $600
The amount of the adjustment for uncollectible accounts = Allowance for uncollectible accounts + $600
= $7,140 + $600
= $7,740
Hence, The amount of the adjustment for uncollectible accounts would be: <u>$7,740.</u>
Answer:
Equilibrium Y = 462.5 , Equilibrium C = 362.5 , Equilibrium S = 100
Explanation:
- At equilibrium : Aggregate Demand = Aggregate Supply
[ AD = C + I ] = [ AS = C + S = Y ]
45 + 0.6Y + 0.05 W + 100 = Y → 45 + 0.6Y + 0.05 (800) + 100 = Y
45 + 40 + 100 + 0.6Y = Y → Y ; 185 + 0.6Y = Y
Y - 0.6Y = 185
0.4Y = 185
Y = 185 / 0.4 = 462.5
- Consumption C = 45 + 0.6Y + 0.05W
Putting Y value : C = 45 + 0.6 (462.5) + 0.05 (800) → C = 45 + 277.5 + 40
C = 362.5
- Income Y is either consumed (C) or saved (S). So, Y = C + S
Hence , S = Y - C → 462.5 - 362.5 = 100
Alternatively : As C + I = C + S
Hence, I = S
Equilibrium Savings = Given Investment = 100
