Explain the difference between President Truman's and Eisenhower's strategies to win or end the

History

1 answer:

Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant but their strategies were opposite to each other.

Explanation:

Both Truman and Eisenhower were anti-communist and extremely militant. However, Truman has more Alliency then Eisenhow. Truman created Organisation of American States (OAS) in 1948 laying down the hemispheres military strategy of defence. He increased the defence expenditure and also created North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949 as response to Stalin's blockade. He opposed the nuclear weapon idea

While Eisenhower focussed on slashing the budget thereby promoting More Military and less tresry. His spending led to mass inflation and created New look plan that rely on bombs for warfare

You might be interested in

The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave powers to the judicial branch that went beyond what the Constitution outlined. Because of this

belka [17]

was ruled unconstitutional.

It was ruled undemocratic because it gave leadership to the judicial department that went beyond what the Constitution drafted. In 1803, U.S Supreme Court case, Marbury vs Madison, a ascertained the expression of "judicial review". It recommended that Courts In America had the inclination to put down regulations or government activities that go against what it is placed in the Constitution. It was alleged undemocratic, due to its endeavors to expand the jurisdiction of the tribunal further than what it was authorized by the Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago

In order to maintain Mongolian power, Kublai Kahn __________.

lutik1710 [3]

<span>Kublai Kahn separated the Chinese and the Mongolians and gave them more fair treatments.</span><span />

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following goals is difficult to achieve in a pure free market system?

mezya [45]

D because without this they could not live

6 0

3 years ago