<u>Beliefs of both Federalists and anti-federalists:</u>
After the proposal of the new Constitution in the United States in 1787, the process of ratification became a prime subjects of argument as there arose two side to debate on it. Those who were in favour of the ratification and activation of new Constitution were termed as Federalists whereas those who were not thinking so, called the anti-federalists. Here are the prime beliefs of both the sides.
The Prime beliefs of both sides on the new Constitution's ratification
Belief of Federalists:
- The proposed Constitution was important for the survival and further development of the nation.
- A strong Government was necessary to excel after the previous failed Confederations.
Belief of Non-Federalists:
- The powers of the government, mentioned in the constitution was specifically granted and prohibited for doing more than that.
- The powers were separated into three groups rather than giving the complete authority an individual to control tyranny.
- The Constitution provided the system of checks and balances which wasn't required as all the branches were able to take care of their checks and balances.
- The Constitution provided addendum powers to the federal courts at the expense of the domestic courts which was unfair.
The United colonies of North America will be free and independent states apart from Great Britain
Answer:
Welfare can create a pattern of dependence.
When multiple needs are being met, from housing to food assistance, then it can create a system of dependence for some individuals or households. When every need is being met, then there is no incentive for an individual to better themselves.
Explanation:
I believe the answer would be A. Levees held back and annual floods of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. And B. Surplus barley and wheat could be traded for other things.
Some people define nationalism as excessive, narrow, or jingoist patriotism. A nationalist might be described as someone who boasts of his patriotism and favors aggressive or warlike policies. The rise of nationalism in Europe led to both division and unification. For example, it unified Germany, but it led Russian tsars to suppress the cultures of national minorities within the country. Nationalism remains a powerful force to this day for unifying countries and for sparking rivalries, conflicts, and bloodshed. Write a persuasive essay in which you support or oppose the idea that nationalism is an excessive form of patriotism. (8 pts)
