The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
The psychological expression of internal needs or valued goals is referred to as your drive.
The titular head of a nation as distinct from the head of the government.
The Arab Maghreb Union or AMU consists of Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, and Tunisia.
When the countries of Tunisia and Morocco became independent countries, it was also during that moment that the concept of an economic union was first thought of. The chief of state of the 5 members of these countries manages the AMU.
The purpose of the Blackstone's commentaries on the laws of England was to provide a source of common law that the people could understand and read. It was divided into four volumes; The right of persons, The right of things, private wrongs, and public wrongs.
